Does slower reaction time predict mortality?

Answered November 2, 202610 sources

EvidenceAStrongGood randomized trials in people that agree, with no serious weaknesses. New studies are unlikely to change the answer.

Yes. Slower reaction time is linked to a modestly higher risk of dying, about 10 to 14% higher in pooled results. It describes groups of people and can't predict one person's fate.

Who it's for
Adults generally, especially older adults; it isn't a screening test for individuals.
What to expect
A modest rise in group risk, not a personal forecast.
Watch out for
Reaction time can't say why someone is at risk or when.
Slower reaction times go with a higher risk of death

Each dot is a pooled result with a line for its range; values above 1 mean higher risk of death.

Slower reaction times go with a higher risk of death
ResultEstimate95% rangeReading
Simple reaction time, all deaths1.11.07 to 1.13Clear worsening
Choice reaction time, all deaths1.141.09 to 1.2Clear worsening
Simple reaction time, heart deaths1.191.14 to 1.24Clear worsening

Source 1 Public Health, 2021

What the studies show

  • A meta-analysis A study that pools the results of several earlier studies into one overall estimate. It is usually the strongest kind of evidence. pooled seven long-term studies of healthy adults aged 18 and over. Slower simple reaction time was linked to about a 10% higher relative risk How much more or less likely something is in one group than another, as a ratio. A big relative change can still be a small change for any one person. of death from any cause and a 19% higher risk of heart disease death. Slower choice reaction time (responding to one of several signals) was linked to a 14% higher risk of death from any cause, but not clearly to heart disease death1. These figures compare groups, so one person's gain or loss depends on their starting risk.
  • A study following 1,196 men for up to 40 years found each 100 milliseconds of slower simple reaction time was linked to a 17% higher relative risk of death. Choice-type reaction time gave 14%5.
  • A study of 1,350 people followed from age 56 for 29 years (833 deaths) linked longer and more variable reaction times to higher risk of death from the major causes. Effects were similar in size to those for an IQ test7. Another study of 898 people followed from age 56 to 70 found reaction time explained the link between IQ and death6.
  • Variability matters, too. A review of 22 studies found that greater trial-to-trial swings in reaction time were consistently linked to higher risk of cognitive decline and death2. Among 790 adults aged 70+ followed for 17 years, more variable simple reaction time was strongly linked to death, while average reaction time was not4. In 861 older adults followed for 8 years, variability predicted death after adjusting for age, sex, thinking scores and heart risk, and average speed did not3.
  • In small studies of sick groups, slower or altered reaction tests were linked to death in 94 people with cirrhosis8. Slower psychomotor speed was linked to death in 166 people with heart failure9.

Key studies

StudyWhoWhat it found
Review of 7 studies, 20211Healthy adults 18+Slower reaction time linked to 10 to 14% higher death risk
Study following people, 200551,196 men, up to 40 years17% higher risk per 100 ms slower
Study following people, 201871,350 people from age 56Slower times linked to death from major causes
Review of 22 studies, 20172Middle-aged and older adultsVariable reaction time linked to decline and death
Study following people, 20144About 790 adults 70+Variability, not average speed, linked to death over 17 years

Safety

Reaction tests carry no known harm. A slow result is a statistical signal and not a diagnosis.

What we don't know

  • Whether slow reaction time causes early death or reflects general ageing of the body and brain. These studies observe people and can't settle that.
  • Whether training to speed up reaction time lowers the risk of death.

Try it yourself: Reaction time

Ask a follow-up

Written by AI from the studies listed, without review by a clinician, and graded with the GRADE method. It can be wrong, so check the studies it cites. Education, not medical advice.