Does a low Digit Symbol Substitution Test score predict dementia and death?

Answered November 2, 20266 sources

EvidenceBModerateGood evidence in people with one real weakness. New studies could change the answer.

Yes, in older adults a low score on this test is linked to a higher risk of death. It is also linked to dementia, though the dementia studies used related speed tests.

Who it's for
Older adults; it can't tell any one person's future.
What to expect
Lower scores go with higher group risk of death and dementia.
Watch out for
Most dementia evidence comes from similar tests, not this one.
Lower digit symbol scores go with a higher risk of death

Each dot shows the risk ratio for death with a line for its likely range, after adjustment for other risk factors.

Lower digit symbol scores go with a higher risk of death
ResultEstimate95% rangeReading
Lower score, men followed 5 years1.441.12 to 1.86Clear worsening

Source 4 Am J Epidemiol, 1995

What the studies show

  • A study that followed 3,156 well-functioning older adults for a median of 8.4 years linked lower scores to a higher risk of death and of new disability, after adjusting for age, heart disease and brain scan changes1. Death rates were 16.3 per 1,000 person-years in people with neither low scores nor slow walking, 20.8 with slow walking only, 42.8 with a low score only, and 61.2 with both1.
  • A study of 1,118 men followed for 5 years linked a score 10 points lower to a 44% higher relative risk How much more or less likely something is in one group than another, as a ratio. A big relative change can still be a small change for any one person. of death after adjustment4. Unadjusted, the relative risk was 79% higher4.
  • A study that followed 1,559 older adults in the Netherlands for up to 21 years found slow processing speed on a coding task linked to nearly twice the risk of death5. The same slowing was linked to lasting thinking decline, with a very large relative risk that came from few cases and a wide margin of error5.
  • In a study of 2,938 Swedish adults, people who developed dementia scored worse on processing speed at the start3. That study used a mix of speed tests, not this one3.
  • A study of 4,072 older adults in Japan used a tablet version of this test as one part of a thinking battery. Low scores on two or more parts were linked to about 4 times the dementia risk over 24 months6. Only 81 people developed dementia, so the estimate is imprecise, and the test's own contribution can't be separated out6.

These figures compare groups, so the gain or loss for one person depends on how high their risk was to begin with.

Key studies

StudyWhoWhat it found
Study following people, 200813,156 older adults, 8.4 yearsLow score linked to more deaths and disability
Study following people, 199541,118 men, 5 years10 points lower linked to 44% higher death risk
Study following people, 201751,559 older adults, up to 21 yearsSlow processing linked to nearly double the death risk
Study following people, 201432,938 adults over 60Slow processing at start in those who developed dementia
Study following people, 201864,072 adults over 65Low scores on 2 or more thinking tests linked to higher dementia risk

Safety

The test is a paper-and-pencil task taking 90 to 120 seconds2. It measures thinking dysfunction but can't say which thinking skill is affected2.

What we don't know

  • Whether a low score on this test alone predicts dementia, since the dementia studies used related tests or batteries.
  • Whether acting on a low score changes outcomes, or how well it sorts individuals.

Try it yourself: Brain speed

Ask a follow-up

Written by AI from the studies listed, without review by a clinician, and graded with the GRADE method. It can be wrong, so check the studies it cites. Education, not medical advice.