Does neurofeedback help anxiety?

Answered November 2, 202610 sources

EvidenceCLimitedStudies in people with real weaknesses: small, short or conflicting trials, or observational studies only.

Neurofeedback eased anxiety in several small trials, but the best reviews can't separate its effect from placebo A dummy treatment that looks like the real one, so people can't tell which they got. and attention. We don't know yet if it works better than other treatments.

Who it's for
People with anxiety curious about it; not shown to beat standard treatments.
What to expect
Small trials show lower anxiety scores; real-world size is unclear.
Watch out for
Weak studies, no clear sham controls, and side effects rarely tracked.
Anxiety scores fell after neurofeedback in both groups

Bars show average anxiety scores before training and after the fifth session for the group trained on the left side of the brain.

Anxiety scores fell after neurofeedback in both groups
Grouppoints on the anxiety scale
Before training47.15
After fifth session38.69

Source 4 Brain Behav, 2021

What the studies show

  • A review of randomized trials People are assigned by chance to the treatment or a comparison, so a difference in results is likely caused by the treatment itself. of biofeedback (including brain-wave neurofeedback) for anxiety disorders found it beat a waiting list. It did not beat active treatments or training in the wrong direction, so its specific effect can't be told apart from general treatment effects. Most trials were rated weak1.
  • A trial of 32 women found that frontal alpha asymmetry neurofeedback lowered anxiety and negative mood more than an active control training. Chance is unlikely to explain it, but the trial was small and short2.
  • A trial of 26 women with generalized anxiety disorder gave ten 40-minute sessions of alpha training over the left or right parietal lobe. Anxiety scores fell in both groups and kept falling at four weeks. With no no-training or sham group, the drop can't be credited to the training4.
  • A trial of 26 healthy people with high anxiety used brain-scan neurofeedback aimed at amygdala-prefrontal links. Anxiety dropped with the real target but not with a sham target, and control held for 3 days. The test was a proof of concept in a short crossover design3.
  • A meta-analysis A study that pools the results of several earlier studies into one overall estimate. It is usually the strongest kind of evidence. of brain-scan neurofeedback in psychiatric disorders found a large anxiety benefit versus controls. Studies differed widely, and only 8 of 22 controlled trials showed clinical benefit over control. The authors called for stronger trials5.
  • A meta-analysis of consumer headband neurofeedback with meditation found a very small drop in distress versus controls. It found no sign the devices changed brain activity. The authors suggest a placebo effect may be at work. Side effects were rarely measured6.
  • A trial of 180 healthy soldiers in stressful training found that EEG neurofeedback aimed at the amygdala improved stress coping measures compared with controls. Anxiety itself wasn't the main outcome9.

Effect sizes How big a difference is on a common scale, so studies that measured it in different ways can be compared. About 0.2 is small, 0.5 medium and 0.8 large. compare groups, so one person's gain depends on how anxious they were to begin with.

Key studies

StudyWhoWhat it found
Review of trials, 20201People with anxiety disordersBeat waiting list; not active treatments or reversed training
Trial, 2017232 womenAnxiety fell more than with active control
Trial, 2019326 healthy, highly anxious peopleReal target cut anxiety; sham did not
Trial, 2021426 women with generalized anxietyScores fell in both groups; no control group
Meta-analysis, 20225Psychiatric patients, brain-scan neurofeedbackLarge anxiety effect; very mixed results

Safety

Side effects were not assessed in 19 of 21 consumer-device studies and were not found in the 2 that checked6.

What we don't know

  • Whether neurofeedback beats sham feedback or standard treatments such as therapy in larger, well-run trials.
  • Which method, number of sessions or target works best, and whether benefits last.

Ask a follow-up

Written by AI from the studies listed, without review by a clinician, and graded with the GRADE method. It can be wrong, so check the studies it cites. Education, not medical advice.