Is hormone therapy safe after menopause?

Answered November 2, 202613 sources

EvidenceBModerateGood evidence in people with one real weakness. New studies could change the answer.

For healthy women under 60 or within 10 years of menopause, hormone therapy is reasonably safe for hot flashes. It raises the risk of blood clots, stroke and, with a progestin, breast cancer. Risks rise with age.

Who it's for
Healthy women under 60 or near menopause with bothersome symptoms; not for preventing disease.
What to expect
Fewer hot flashes and fractures, with small added risks of clots, stroke and breast cancer.
Watch out for
Blood clots, stroke, and breast cancer with estrogen plus progestin.
Combined hormone therapy raised some risks and lowered others

Each dot is the risk ratio in a large trial with a line for its 95% range, and 1 means no difference from placebo.

Combined hormone therapy raised some risks and lowered others
ResultEstimate95% rangeReading
Stroke1.411.07 to 1.85Clear worsening
Lung blood clot2.131.39 to 3.25Clear worsening
Breast cancer1.261 to 1.59No clear difference
Heart disease1.291.02 to 1.63Probably worse
Hip fracture0.660.45 to 0.98Probably better
Colorectal cancer0.630.43 to 0.92Clear improvement

Source 7 JAMA, 2002

Pooled trials show more stroke and clots but no change in deaths

Each dot is a pooled risk ratio across trials with a line for its 95% range, and 1 means no difference from placebo.

Pooled trials show more stroke and clots but no change in deaths
ResultEstimate95% rangeReading
Death from any cause0.960.85 to 1.09No clear difference
Heart events0.970.82 to 1.14No clear difference
Stroke1.231.08 to 1.41Clear worsening
Blood clot in a vein1.861.39 to 2.5Clear worsening

Source 3 BMC Womens Health, 2024

Figure 2. Different effects of MHT and placebo (or no treatment) on outcomes included in this review (A-L).

Figure 2 from The benefits and risks of menopause hormone therapy for the cardiovascular…, BMC Womens Health 2024. Licence: CC BY 4.0

Figure 7. Effect of 5 years or of 10 years of MHT use, starting from age 50 years, on 20-year breast cancer incidence rates Relevance of MHT use and of adiposity to the absolute 20-year…

Figure 7 from Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk, Lancet 2019. Licence: CC BY 4.0

What guidelines say

The North American Menopause Society says the balance is favorable for women under 60 or within 10 years of menopause who have bothersome hot flashes or bone loss, and less favorable when started later1. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends against combined estrogen and progestin to prevent chronic disease in women without symptoms. It does not apply to symptom treatment2.

What the studies show

  • A review that pooled 33 trials (44,639 women, average age 60) found hormone therapy did not change death from any cause or heart disease overall. It raised stroke risk by about a quarter and clot risk (venous thromboembolism) by about 1.9 times3. Women who started within 10 years of menopause had fewer deaths and heart events than later starters3.
  • A review of reviews found hormone therapy cut hot flash frequency by more than half and lowered fractures by about 28%. It also raised stroke risk and probably clot risk. Quality of the underlying reviews was moderate to poor4.
  • In the Women's Health Initiative trial of estrogen plus progestin (16,608 women, 5.2 years), each 10,000 women per year had 7 more heart attacks, 8 more strokes, 8 more lung clots and 8 more breast cancers. They also had 5 fewer hip fractures and 6 fewer colorectal cancers7,11. These figures compare groups, so one woman's gain or harm depends on her starting risk.
  • Estrogen alone (in women without a uterus) did not raise heart disease risk in the same trials, and breast cancer was lower than with a dummy pill (placebo A dummy treatment that looks like the real one, so people can't tell which they got.)9. Estrogen plus progestin raised the risk of dementia in women 65 and older, about 23 extra cases per 10,000 women a year10.
  • Large studies following women linked every type except vaginal estrogen to more breast cancer. For 5 years of use from age 50, that is about 1 extra case per 50 users of estrogen plus daily progestin and 1 per 200 for estrogen alone6. These are observational Studies that watch what happens to people rather than assigning a treatment. They can show links, not cause and effect., so cause is not proven.
  • The Women's Health Initiative enrolled women averaging 63, so its results may not apply to women starting near menopause8.

Key studies

StudyWhoWhat it found
Review of 33 trials, 2024344,639 postmenopausal womenMore stroke and clots; no change in deaths overall
Trial, 2002716,608 healthy women, estrogen plus progestinExtra heart, stroke, clot and breast cancer cases
Trial follow-up, 2013927,347 women aged 50 to 79Estrogen alone more balanced; younger women fared better
Study following women, 20196108,647 women with breast cancerBreast cancer risk rose with years of use
Review of reviews, 2021443,188 women (fracture analysis)Fewer fractures and hot flashes; more stroke

Safety

Estrogen alone raises endometrial cancer risk in women with a uterus, and the FDA label carries a boxed warning for endometrial cancer, heart disease, breast cancer and probable dementia13. In breast cancer survivors, trials found a higher chance of recurrence, about 1.5 times that of women not taking it5. Gallbladder disease also rose4,9. A clinician decides whether it suits a given person.

What we don't know

  • Trials in women starting at 50 to 55 are few, so long-term risks for typical starters are less certain8.
  • Which doses, patches or hormone types are safest hasn't been settled in large trials.

Ask a follow-up

Written by AI from the studies listed, without review by a clinician, and graded with the GRADE method. It can be wrong, so check the studies it cites. Education, not medical advice.